Contact
Three reasons people write, and what to put in the message so the reply is useful. Everything goes to one address; the subject line is what sorts it.
You have read a ruling and disagree
For scholars and students of the discipline. The rulings on this site were drafted by our internal scholars, which is stated wherever a ruling appears. If one is wrong, or rests on a source that does not carry it, we would rather hear it from you than not.
Worth including
- Which form of waqf, by its name or by a link to its page under Forms of waqf.
- The part of the ruling you think does not hold.
- What you would say instead, and what it rests on.
Write to us admin@ibfnet.group, subject “A ruling”
Your institution administers awqaf
For an organisation that wants to operate on this platform. Waqf Operators sets out what the mandate confers and what the platform refuses to let it do; this is the way to start the conversation.
Worth including
- The organisation, and where it is established.
- What it administers now, and under whose supervision.
- Who would hold the mandate, and who would sit on its council.
Write to us admin@ibfnet.group, subject “Operator”
Anything else
A question the FAQ does not answer, something on the site that is wrong or broken, or a use of a waqf we have not thought about.
Worth including
- The page you were on, if it is about the site itself.
- What you expected, and what happened instead.
Write to us admin@ibfnet.group, subject “Waqf.Finance”
We cannot tell you by email whether your waqf is valid, which is for a scholar independent of us who has read your papers, and we cannot give financial or legal advice. Nothing here is final yet.
